ROM AD TAACNIT OO THE AAV
Te a
ROARD FOR: CORRECTION OL NAVAL REGORDS
701 5. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO2459-14
10 October 2014
I
This is in reference to your application for correction to your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section
1552 :
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October
2014. Your allegations of. error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the
advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420
PERS-806 of 16 Jul 2014, a COpy of which was provided to you on cL
August 2014, and is being provided to you now.
n making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
Hh
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, 4t is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
ction of an or- al ThaVvas
wnen applying for a correcti
consequently,
nt to demonstrate the existen
record, the burden is on the applica
probable material error oF injustice.
Sincerely,
s = ws
Cl tas} | | ALAA
LEY Ae
ROBERT J. ONETLL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4268 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously congidered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. when applying for a correction of an official naval Consequently, record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4293 14
You requested removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 23 October 2013 and your undated rebuttal. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6869 14
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1600 RcT of 5 May 2014, a copy of which was previously provided to you on 27 May 2014 and again on 5 June 2014 to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07794-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former spouse naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’s In addition, the Board considered After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. letter from DFAS-CL dated 14 June 1999 which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06211-06
6211-06 31 October 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. spouse has been...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4022 14
OA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Additionally, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 1 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2358 14
This is in reference to your application fo naval record A three-member panel of the Board e session, mber 2014. accordance with administrative Records, sitting in executiv application on 30 Septe injustice were reviewed in regulations and procedures appl Board. ‘3.E, Members may check TES periodically for status of their application.” There is no evidence that you entered the TEB website to transfer your benefits. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4147 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval the burden is om the applicant record, probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4396 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5864 14
NT i] F THE NAVY ACO ADOTA wit in POARD FOR COR ection OF NAVAL REG! Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420 PERS-806 of 17 Jul 2014, @ copy of which was provided to you on 1.